![]() This is where I feel MyPaint lost its traction. ![]() But to ignore most complaints from users isn’t good either. The good thing about going a new way when designing a program is that innovate and maybe find better ways of doing things. Many users feel that they have to fight the program instead of working with it. This becomes a problem when new programs comes along with their own ideas on how to go about doing things. When a program gets really popular it becomes convention… people get so used to its workflow that they begin to expect similar applications to, maybe not work exactly the same, but similar enough that they can figure them out with little effort. If anyone wishes to discuss this I would be pleased to exchange opinions and ideas, But I prefer board work, I also got paid a great deal more for my design work than the computer designers. I am very proficient with Architectural Desktop, Autocad etc. ![]() ![]() Now there are CAD operators rather than designer draftsmen. Everything was done by hand on a board (hence the name “board work”). I started when computer design programs were rare. The problem is similar to my experience in architectural design. It turned out that I was spending more time and attention on operating the program than working on the art. My idea was to use the program to test colouring, textures, etc. I tried using the MyPaint program for a while, but it was more of a an impediment than a useful tool, I have tried several programs of this type. It’s been quite a while since I dropped in on this site.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |